×

Our award-winning reporting has moved

Context provides news and analysis on three of the world’s most critical issues:

climate change, the impact of technology on society, and inclusive economies.

Rwanda considers pulling peacekeepers from Darfur

by reuters | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Tuesday, 31 August 2010 19:03 GMT

* Rwanda has 3,485 soldiers, 143 police in Darfur

* Calls U.N. report claims of genocide 'malicious'

* Accuses U.N. of double standards (Adds details, U.N. spokesman; paragraphs 2, 10)

By Kezio-Musoke David

KIGALI, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Rwanda is considering pulling out all its troops from United Nations peacekeeping missions, starting with Darfur, after a leaked draft U.N. report said Rwandan troops may have committed genocide in Congo.

The Central African nation has some 3,485 soldiers and 143 police officers deployed in Sudan's western Darfur region, according to U.N. figures. The world body says conflict in Darfur has killed as many as 300,000 people since 2003.

"Starting with Darfur, we have instructed our force commander to make contingency plans for immediate withdrawal as we wait to see how the U.N. treats this report," Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo told reporters.

The draft U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights report details some 600 serious crimes committed by various forces from a number of nations in Congo during the 1990s.

However, experts said Rwanda came off worst due to the genocide charge. Rwanda has rejected the allegations in the leaked report as "malicious" and "ridiculous." [ID:nN27100596]

"The U.N. can't have it both ways. You can't have a force serving as peacekeepers and it is the same force you are accusing of genocide," Mushikiwabo said.

U.N. peacekeepers were widely criticized for failing to prevent the 1994 slaughter of 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in Rwanda that ended only after Tutsi-led fighters under current President Paul Kagame retook control of the country.

Rwanda's army then invaded Congo, ostensibly to hunt down Hutu fighters who had taken part in the killings and fled into eastern Congo, then known as Zaire.

In the process, Rwandan forces helped sweep the Congolese AFDL rebels of Laurent Kabila to power in Congo. Both forces have been accused of a string of rights abuses against Hutu fighters and civilians across the country.

SHORTEST TIME POSSIBLE

In New York, U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky declined to respond to the latest threat, saying the world body was "aware of the media reports ... out there today." He declined to say whether U.N. officials had been in touch with Kigali.

A Rwandan army spokesman said the military had finalized a contingency withdrawal plan that it was prepared to enact should the U.N. publish its report as drafted.

"All logistical and personnel resources are in place. The pullout will take the shortest time possible," Lieutenant Colonel Jill Rutaremara told reporters.

In Geneva, a U.N. spokesman denied media reports that the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, had come under pressure from U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon to remove the word 'genocide' from the text of the report.

"I want to make it crystal clear, this is absolutely untrue. Up to this point the secretary-general has never put pressure on the high commissioner to alter the text," Rupert Colville, Pillay's spokesman, told a news briefing in Geneva.

"The report is finished," he said.

There was no fixed date for the release of the report, which he hoped would be very soon, but a decision on timing was in the hands of U.N. headquarters in New York, Colville said.

He said the leak had complicated matters and added Ban was consulting with the U.N. peacekeeping department and others. (Additional reporting by Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva and Louis Charbonneau in New York; writing by Richard Lough; editing by Peter Graff)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

-->